Review



antip egfr antibody  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antip egfr antibody
    Figure 1. <t>EGFR</t> is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001
    Antip Egfr Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1367 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/antip+egfr+antibody/Phospho-EGF+Receptor+(Tyr1068)+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pm24853121-118-17-22
    Average 96 stars, based on 1367 article reviews
    antip egfr antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma."

    Article Title: Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

    Journal: PloS one

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098557

    Figure 1. EGFR is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 1. EGFR is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001

    Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing

    Figure 2. Dacomitinib demonstrated in vitro efficacy in EGFR over-expressing SCCHN cell lines. (A to D) Growth inhibition of three SCCHN and the NOE cell lines, treated with Dacomitinib, with or without IR. (B) FaDu; (C) UT-SCC-8; (D) UT-SCC-42a; and (E) NOE cells were treated with Dacomitinib (0, 10, 25, 50, 100, or 250 nM) alone, or in combination with IR (0, 2, or 4 Gy). MTS assays were conducted 72 hours post-treatment. The graphs represent data from 3 independent experiments, with the mean 6 SEM reported. *p,0.05, **p,0.01, ***p,0.001; one-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference between curves for Figure 2A-D; two-way ANOVA. Combination of Dacomitinib plus RT did not result in a synergistic interaction for any of the dosing regimens in all three SCCHN cell lines (Chou-Talalay Method). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g002
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Dacomitinib demonstrated in vitro efficacy in EGFR over-expressing SCCHN cell lines. (A to D) Growth inhibition of three SCCHN and the NOE cell lines, treated with Dacomitinib, with or without IR. (B) FaDu; (C) UT-SCC-8; (D) UT-SCC-42a; and (E) NOE cells were treated with Dacomitinib (0, 10, 25, 50, 100, or 250 nM) alone, or in combination with IR (0, 2, or 4 Gy). MTS assays were conducted 72 hours post-treatment. The graphs represent data from 3 independent experiments, with the mean 6 SEM reported. *p,0.05, **p,0.01, ***p,0.001; one-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference between curves for Figure 2A-D; two-way ANOVA. Combination of Dacomitinib plus RT did not result in a synergistic interaction for any of the dosing regimens in all three SCCHN cell lines (Chou-Talalay Method). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g002

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Expressing, Inhibition

    Figure 4. Treatment of SCCHN cells with Dacomitinib inhibited EGFR signalling. FaDu, UT-SCC-8, and UT-SCC-42a cells were treated with Dacomitinib (D; 0, 10, 50, 100, 250, or 500 nM) in serum-free media for 24 hours. Thirty minutes prior to lysis, cells were stimulated with EGF (20 ng/ mL). Experiments were performed three independent times, with similar results; representative blots are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g004
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Treatment of SCCHN cells with Dacomitinib inhibited EGFR signalling. FaDu, UT-SCC-8, and UT-SCC-42a cells were treated with Dacomitinib (D; 0, 10, 50, 100, 250, or 500 nM) in serum-free media for 24 hours. Thirty minutes prior to lysis, cells were stimulated with EGF (20 ng/ mL). Experiments were performed three independent times, with similar results; representative blots are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g004

    Techniques Used: Lysis

    Figure 6. Dacomitinib delayed FaDu tumor growth, alone and in combination with IR. (A) FaDu-bearing mice were randomized to: (i) DMSO control; (ii) Dacomitinib (5 mg/kg/d) delivered orally on days 1 to 5; (iii) local tumor irradiation (IR; 2 Gy/treatment) delivered on days 2 and 5; or (iv) Dacomitinib plus IR. Mean tumor leg diameter (TLD) from three independent experiments (three mice per treatment group, per experiment) is reported 6 SEM. ***p,0.001, negative control vs. Dacomitinib only, or RT only vs. Dacomitinib plus RT; Student’s t test. (B) Mean mouse weight 6 SEM from experiment (A). (C) Ki-67 staining was performed on treated FaDu tumors: DMSO, radiation (IR), Dacomitinib (D), or Dacomitinib plus radiation (D+IR), as from (A). Tumors were extracted from mice 24 hours after the final treatment. Ki-67 positive cells stain dark brown. The right-hand panel represents the proportion of Ki-67-positive cells for each treatment group. Ki-67 scoring was conducted by counting the number of positive tumor cells in 3 representative sections for each tumor. Mean 6 SEM is reported. ***p,0.001; Student’s t test. (D) p-EGFR staining was performed on paraffin sections, as in (C). Positive Staining for p-EGFR is brown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g006
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 6. Dacomitinib delayed FaDu tumor growth, alone and in combination with IR. (A) FaDu-bearing mice were randomized to: (i) DMSO control; (ii) Dacomitinib (5 mg/kg/d) delivered orally on days 1 to 5; (iii) local tumor irradiation (IR; 2 Gy/treatment) delivered on days 2 and 5; or (iv) Dacomitinib plus IR. Mean tumor leg diameter (TLD) from three independent experiments (three mice per treatment group, per experiment) is reported 6 SEM. ***p,0.001, negative control vs. Dacomitinib only, or RT only vs. Dacomitinib plus RT; Student’s t test. (B) Mean mouse weight 6 SEM from experiment (A). (C) Ki-67 staining was performed on treated FaDu tumors: DMSO, radiation (IR), Dacomitinib (D), or Dacomitinib plus radiation (D+IR), as from (A). Tumors were extracted from mice 24 hours after the final treatment. Ki-67 positive cells stain dark brown. The right-hand panel represents the proportion of Ki-67-positive cells for each treatment group. Ki-67 scoring was conducted by counting the number of positive tumor cells in 3 representative sections for each tumor. Mean 6 SEM is reported. ***p,0.001; Student’s t test. (D) p-EGFR staining was performed on paraffin sections, as in (C). Positive Staining for p-EGFR is brown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g006

    Techniques Used: Control, Irradiation, Negative Control, Staining

    Related Articles

    Immunohistochemistry:

    Article Title: Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Article Snippet: Immunohistochemistry was conducted using a purified mouse anti-human Ki-67 antigen (1:100 dilution; DakoCytomation), as previously described [27]. .. Phospho-EGFR immunohistochemistry was performed using microwave antigen retrieval in combination with the Level-2 Ultra Streptavidin System and antip-EGFR antibody (1:100 dilution; #3777, Cell Signalling), as previously described [28]. .. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasemediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) staining was assessed using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics).



    Similar Products

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology rabbit antip akt
    Rabbit Antip Akt, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/antip+egfr+antibody/EGFR+Antibody/pm37506859-57-7-28
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit antip akt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antip egfr antibody
    Figure 1. <t>EGFR</t> is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001
    Antip Egfr Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/antip+egfr+antibody/Phospho-EGF+Receptor+(Tyr1068)+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pm24853121-118-17-22
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antip egfr antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology antip-egfr (tyr 1173) antibody
    Figure 1. <t>EGFR</t> is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001
    Antip Egfr (Tyr 1173) Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/antip+egfr+antibody/p+egfr/pm22032630-24-33-37
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antip-egfr (tyr 1173) antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antip-egfr (tyr) antibody
    Figure 1. <t>EGFR</t> is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001
    Antip Egfr (Tyr) Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/antip+egfr+antibody/antip+egfr++tyr++antibody/10__1158_slash_0008___5472__can___07___0411-59-8-10
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antip-egfr (tyr) antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Novus Biologicals rabbit antip egfr tyr 1173 r
    Figure 1. <t>EGFR</t> is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001
    Rabbit Antip Egfr Tyr 1173 R, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/antip+egfr+antibody/EGFR+%5Bp+Tyr1173%5D+Antibody+(RM269)/pmc02631213-126-28-33
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit antip egfr tyr 1173 r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Figure 1. EGFR is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001

    Journal: PloS one

    Article Title: Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098557

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. EGFR is over-expressed in SCCHN cell lines. qRT-PCR was performed to measure ErbB transcript levels in the three SCCHN cell lines, normalized to that of the normal oral epithelial (NOE) cells. Expression fold change was determined by the 22DDCt method. ***p, 0.001; student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g001

    Article Snippet: Phospho-EGFR immunohistochemistry was performed using microwave antigen retrieval in combination with the Level-2 Ultra Streptavidin System and antip-EGFR antibody (1:100 dilution; #3777, Cell Signalling), as previously described [28].

    Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing

    Figure 2. Dacomitinib demonstrated in vitro efficacy in EGFR over-expressing SCCHN cell lines. (A to D) Growth inhibition of three SCCHN and the NOE cell lines, treated with Dacomitinib, with or without IR. (B) FaDu; (C) UT-SCC-8; (D) UT-SCC-42a; and (E) NOE cells were treated with Dacomitinib (0, 10, 25, 50, 100, or 250 nM) alone, or in combination with IR (0, 2, or 4 Gy). MTS assays were conducted 72 hours post-treatment. The graphs represent data from 3 independent experiments, with the mean 6 SEM reported. *p,0.05, **p,0.01, ***p,0.001; one-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference between curves for Figure 2A-D; two-way ANOVA. Combination of Dacomitinib plus RT did not result in a synergistic interaction for any of the dosing regimens in all three SCCHN cell lines (Chou-Talalay Method). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g002

    Journal: PloS one

    Article Title: Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098557

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Dacomitinib demonstrated in vitro efficacy in EGFR over-expressing SCCHN cell lines. (A to D) Growth inhibition of three SCCHN and the NOE cell lines, treated with Dacomitinib, with or without IR. (B) FaDu; (C) UT-SCC-8; (D) UT-SCC-42a; and (E) NOE cells were treated with Dacomitinib (0, 10, 25, 50, 100, or 250 nM) alone, or in combination with IR (0, 2, or 4 Gy). MTS assays were conducted 72 hours post-treatment. The graphs represent data from 3 independent experiments, with the mean 6 SEM reported. *p,0.05, **p,0.01, ***p,0.001; one-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference between curves for Figure 2A-D; two-way ANOVA. Combination of Dacomitinib plus RT did not result in a synergistic interaction for any of the dosing regimens in all three SCCHN cell lines (Chou-Talalay Method). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g002

    Article Snippet: Phospho-EGFR immunohistochemistry was performed using microwave antigen retrieval in combination with the Level-2 Ultra Streptavidin System and antip-EGFR antibody (1:100 dilution; #3777, Cell Signalling), as previously described [28].

    Techniques: In Vitro, Expressing, Inhibition

    Figure 4. Treatment of SCCHN cells with Dacomitinib inhibited EGFR signalling. FaDu, UT-SCC-8, and UT-SCC-42a cells were treated with Dacomitinib (D; 0, 10, 50, 100, 250, or 500 nM) in serum-free media for 24 hours. Thirty minutes prior to lysis, cells were stimulated with EGF (20 ng/ mL). Experiments were performed three independent times, with similar results; representative blots are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g004

    Journal: PloS one

    Article Title: Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098557

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Treatment of SCCHN cells with Dacomitinib inhibited EGFR signalling. FaDu, UT-SCC-8, and UT-SCC-42a cells were treated with Dacomitinib (D; 0, 10, 50, 100, 250, or 500 nM) in serum-free media for 24 hours. Thirty minutes prior to lysis, cells were stimulated with EGF (20 ng/ mL). Experiments were performed three independent times, with similar results; representative blots are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g004

    Article Snippet: Phospho-EGFR immunohistochemistry was performed using microwave antigen retrieval in combination with the Level-2 Ultra Streptavidin System and antip-EGFR antibody (1:100 dilution; #3777, Cell Signalling), as previously described [28].

    Techniques: Lysis

    Figure 6. Dacomitinib delayed FaDu tumor growth, alone and in combination with IR. (A) FaDu-bearing mice were randomized to: (i) DMSO control; (ii) Dacomitinib (5 mg/kg/d) delivered orally on days 1 to 5; (iii) local tumor irradiation (IR; 2 Gy/treatment) delivered on days 2 and 5; or (iv) Dacomitinib plus IR. Mean tumor leg diameter (TLD) from three independent experiments (three mice per treatment group, per experiment) is reported 6 SEM. ***p,0.001, negative control vs. Dacomitinib only, or RT only vs. Dacomitinib plus RT; Student’s t test. (B) Mean mouse weight 6 SEM from experiment (A). (C) Ki-67 staining was performed on treated FaDu tumors: DMSO, radiation (IR), Dacomitinib (D), or Dacomitinib plus radiation (D+IR), as from (A). Tumors were extracted from mice 24 hours after the final treatment. Ki-67 positive cells stain dark brown. The right-hand panel represents the proportion of Ki-67-positive cells for each treatment group. Ki-67 scoring was conducted by counting the number of positive tumor cells in 3 representative sections for each tumor. Mean 6 SEM is reported. ***p,0.001; Student’s t test. (D) p-EGFR staining was performed on paraffin sections, as in (C). Positive Staining for p-EGFR is brown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g006

    Journal: PloS one

    Article Title: Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098557

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. Dacomitinib delayed FaDu tumor growth, alone and in combination with IR. (A) FaDu-bearing mice were randomized to: (i) DMSO control; (ii) Dacomitinib (5 mg/kg/d) delivered orally on days 1 to 5; (iii) local tumor irradiation (IR; 2 Gy/treatment) delivered on days 2 and 5; or (iv) Dacomitinib plus IR. Mean tumor leg diameter (TLD) from three independent experiments (three mice per treatment group, per experiment) is reported 6 SEM. ***p,0.001, negative control vs. Dacomitinib only, or RT only vs. Dacomitinib plus RT; Student’s t test. (B) Mean mouse weight 6 SEM from experiment (A). (C) Ki-67 staining was performed on treated FaDu tumors: DMSO, radiation (IR), Dacomitinib (D), or Dacomitinib plus radiation (D+IR), as from (A). Tumors were extracted from mice 24 hours after the final treatment. Ki-67 positive cells stain dark brown. The right-hand panel represents the proportion of Ki-67-positive cells for each treatment group. Ki-67 scoring was conducted by counting the number of positive tumor cells in 3 representative sections for each tumor. Mean 6 SEM is reported. ***p,0.001; Student’s t test. (D) p-EGFR staining was performed on paraffin sections, as in (C). Positive Staining for p-EGFR is brown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098557.g006

    Article Snippet: Phospho-EGFR immunohistochemistry was performed using microwave antigen retrieval in combination with the Level-2 Ultra Streptavidin System and antip-EGFR antibody (1:100 dilution; #3777, Cell Signalling), as previously described [28].

    Techniques: Control, Irradiation, Negative Control, Staining